A couple of days ago I did a brief post about this issue with legal graffitti sites that a certain leader of a certain East Midlands urban council has got his thong in a twist about. I decided to do a bit more of a look into this rather pointless row.
So what sort of 'public urban art' sites are for the chop then? This one?
No. Not that one.
You see, that's not actually graffitti despite appearances, it's actually an officially sanctioned 'brightening up' exercise, look -
I'm really not sure why this urban art
is good whereas these are bad.
If anybody can explain, there's a handy comments facility you can access to tell us all about it.
Saturday, 20 February 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think it's called hypocrisy...
Post a Comment