More interesting to me though is the following extract -
"The city council has now decided to drop the investigation, claiming it had spent £100,000 on in-house solicitors.
I did question the use of in-house solicitors carrying out the investigation the other day on the basis that NCC is normally very keen to bring in external consultants so it's strange that they don't bother in one of the situations where it would be extremely appropriate to do so. Now it seems that they DID bring outside lawyers in but not to do the investigation, just to free up the internal legal teams who presumably could be relied on not to look in the 'wrong' places.
This just gets murkier by the day.
Surely this is a case for the soon-to-be-abolished Audit Commission to investigate not the housing scandal per se but the way in which the City Council responded to it and the efficiency and veracity with which they carried out their 'internal investigations'.
ReplyDeleteYou'd think so wouldn't you? But according to the Post the District Auditor has already signed off their decision to call off the investigation.
ReplyDeleteCheck out the most recent comment on this on my blog. Funny how the same names keep on cropping up isn't it?
ReplyDelete