tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-52790914052341367712024-03-14T06:33:11.571+00:00Nottingham City Council LOLsWant to know what your favourite local council (and some of its friends) gets up to? We trawl through all the boring minutes, press releases and Freedom of Information requests so you don't have to.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.comBlogger592125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-22654747762910139862016-12-18T19:34:00.002+00:002016-12-18T19:34:47.658+00:00Reindeer at National Ice CentreI've just heard about an even being held at the National Ice Centre on 21-23 December which includes live reindeer being there to be fed and petted by visitors.<br />
<br />
There are serious welfare issues for reindeer being used in this way and it seems odd that the council allows events like this to happen yet, rightly, <a href="https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/local_legislation_information_fo_117#incoming-893540" target="_blank">does not allow live animals in circuses</a> performing on its land.<br />
<br />
As a result I have written to my local councillors about the issue and I suggest that you do likewise. The text of my email is below and includes relevant links for information.<br />
<br />
<i>"I am writing to you with serious concern about the planned even at the
NIC featuring reindeer being available to 'pet and feed' 21-23 December
</i>
<i><br /><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.national-ice-centre.com/christmas-at-the-national-ice-centre/">https://www.national-ice-centre.com/christmas-at-the-national-ice-centre/</a>
</i>
<i><br />There are serious concerns for the welfare of reindeer taking part in
events where crowds, noise and physical contact will be inevitable.
These animals are simply not used to such conditions
</i>
<i><br /><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.captiveanimals.org/news/2013/10/caps-warning-over-reindeer-welfare-in-run-up-to-christmas">http://www.captiveanimals.org/news/2013/10/caps-warning-over-reindeer-welfare-in-run-up-to-christmas</a>
</i>
<i><br /><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30127377">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-30127377</a>
</i>
<i><br />It also seems odd that, while NCC refuses to allow live animals to
perform in circuses held on council land yet it allows reindeer to be
used in such a way, when the likelihood of stressful encounters from
crowds is so much greater. Furthermore, escapes from festive events is
not unprecedented
</i>
<i><br /><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/chaos-carlton-reindeer-escapes-festive-event/story-28397074-detail/story.html">http://www.nottinghampost.com/chaos-carlton-reindeer-escapes-festive-event/story-28397074-detail/story.html</a>
</i>
<i><br />This raises issues of possible injury to both the reindeer and the
public in such a built up area.
</i>
<i><br />I ask that you urgently raise this issue within the council and/or other
authorities as appropriate with a view to stopping the reindeer to be
put at risk in this way. I also ask that, at the earliest opportunity,
you initiate discussion within the council to deal with the issue of
reindeer at festive events as part of the council's animal welfare policies.
</i>
<i><br />Thank you for your attention and I look forward to hearing back from you"
</i>Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-17007447434444093932016-07-01T08:40:00.000+01:002016-07-02T01:31:58.588+01:00Anti-Corbyn CouncillorsLabourlist has published a <a href="http://labourlist.org/2016/06/over-500-councillors-tell-corbyn-time-to-step-down/" target="_blank">letter</a> from 500+ local councillors calling on jeremy Corbyn to stand down as leader of the Labour Party. A small number are from Nottingham City Council and I list them below;<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/alex-norris/" target="_blank">Alex Norris</a> (Basford)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/david-trimble/" target="_blank">David Trimble</a> (Dunkirk and Lenton)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/nick-mcdonald/" target="_blank">Nick McDonald</a> (Bulwell Forest)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/sam-webster/" target="_blank">Sam Webster</a> (Wollaton East and Lenton Abbey)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/steve-young/" target="_blank">Steve Young</a> (Clifton South)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/toby-neal/" target="_blank">Toby Neal</a> (Berridge)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/brian-parbutt/" target="_blank">Brian Parbutt</a> (Sherwood)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/about-the-council/councillors-and-leadership/find-a-councillor/nicola-heaton/" target="_blank">Nicola Heaton</a> (Bridge)<br />
<br />
I provide these details merely for information, you may wish to write to them (politely is best) if you are a constituent and/or remember them when the next election comes up in 2019.<br />
<br />
Update; just checking this again following reports that the list was partly fiction. As far as NCC is concerned there are a couple of additions added aboveAndyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-45613839087747905342016-03-20T20:42:00.000+00:002016-03-21T08:24:35.030+00:00#givetowhothefuckyouwantApparently there's been some strange posters popping up around Nottingham telling you what to do with your own money<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GUehA2yiJG4/Vu8KnAuEQ6I/AAAAAAAADgU/gevcnPGnjpY0oFUcnSy1zTaAtohLRUW9A/s1600/Givesmart%2Bparody.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GUehA2yiJG4/Vu8KnAuEQ6I/AAAAAAAADgU/gevcnPGnjpY0oFUcnSy1zTaAtohLRUW9A/s640/Givesmart%2Bparody.jpg" width="386" /></a></div>
<br />
Reckon they should sack the graphics designer mind...<br />
<br />
Addendum - in case you're wondering what this is all about it's NCC's latest <a href="http://www.mynottinghamnews.com/new-begging-campaign-urges-people-to-givesmart/" target="_blank">campaign to demonise beggars</a> Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-26008495378024471942016-03-06T22:10:00.001+00:002016-03-06T22:10:49.326+00:00Hate Crime Reporting - Surreal Follow UpShortly after posting my <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/nottingham-city-councils-shit-hate.html" target="_blank">piece</a> the other day about NCC's poor quality advice on how to report hate crime, I found myself in this slightly surreal Twitter convo -<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IMOssYwBQ0E/VtypYkHTRUI/AAAAAAAADfc/usfwnyiQGbA/s1600/RA%2BTweets.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="640" src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IMOssYwBQ0E/VtypYkHTRUI/AAAAAAAADfc/usfwnyiQGbA/s640/RA%2BTweets.jpg" width="604" /></a></div>
In case you didn't know, Antcliff is NCC's Chief Anti-Social Behaviour Officer.<br />
<br />
I was actually trying to report a Community Protection Officer for disability harassment against me. As you can see, I did try to tell him, just not sure that he took it in.<br />
<br />
Anyway, thanks to Mr Antcliff I did manage to report one of his staff for a hate crime, got a hate crime number and everything. Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-77550383145886764762016-03-05T05:21:00.000+00:002016-03-06T21:56:39.474+00:00Nottingham City Council's Shit Hate Crime AdviceAn extract from the City Council's <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/article/28965/Hate-Crime" target="_blank">webpage</a> on hate crime reporting (<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B74-4UpEy_HEckExVExvWDQtYzg/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank">link</a> to screenshot as I guess it may change soon) -<br />
<ul>
<li><i>Stop Hate UK has a 24 hour third party reporting line for witnesses and victims of hate crime. This reporting service is independent of the police and will not pass information to them, unless the caller wishes for this to be done on their behalf</i></li>
<li><i>... </i></li>
<li><i>Email <a href="mailto:talk@stophateuk.org">talk@stophateuk.org</a> </i></li>
</ul>
An extract from the email I received from <a href="http://www.stophateuk.org/" target="_blank">Stop Hate UK</a> today -<br />
<br />
<i>"Unfortunately this is not something we are able to look into as we are not commissioned to operate in Nottingham..."</i><br />
<br />
Thanks a lot Nottingham City Council for your bullshit hate crime reporting advice.<br />
<br />
Important note; Stop Hate Uk's website <a href="http://www.stophateuk.org/report-lgb-and-t-hate-crime/" target="_blank">DOES say</a> that they are available to assist with LGBT hate crime across England, Wales and Scotland. It's just that I was trying to report disability hate crime. Mind you I don't think that NCC recognises that such a thing exists.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-82345564159743067482016-02-05T15:35:00.000+00:002016-02-05T15:36:07.291+00:00Approved RebellionFunny old world this. One day you get an email from Nottingham City Council including the following;<br />
<i><br />"We were successful because of the link to the riots of October 1831 when a crowd of Nottingham citizens surged towards the Castle, furious with the residing Duke of Newcastle who had just openly declared his opposition to the Reform Act. This banner is a representation of the democracy the Nottingham rioters were protesting for.<br /><br />The people of Nottingham burnt down castles for the right to vote. What a talking point for the electorate of the city today!"</i><br />
<br />
<span style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.5;">Riots! Protest!! Burning down castles!!! Heady stuff. This concerned the planned transformation of the castle which will include a museum of rebellion.</span><br />
<span style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.5;"><br /></span>
<span style="background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.5;">Another day we get this <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Council-leader-slams-protesters-taking-advantage/story-28555796-detail/story.html" target="_blank">in the paper</a> from Leader of the Council Lord JoCo;</span><br />
<br />
<i>"[Staff] were subject to some frankly appalling behaviour from protesters at the weekend when they vandalised this building at significant cost to local council tax payers.<br /> </i><br />
<i>Let's be absolutely clear, they were not homeless, there have not been homeless people in any number in any of those protests. We are talking about the same people who have been involved in taking advantage of Mickey Summers around his particular issues, and Tom Crawford around his particular issues.</i><br />
<br />
<i>This is a small number of antiestablishment protestors whose interest is in protest, damage, threatening and actually, from time to time, violent behaviour towards council staff."</i><br />
<br />
Anti-establishment! Appalling behaviour!! Chalk on buildings!!! What a wanker.<br />
<br />
You see, there is approved rebellion eg, that which happened a long time ago or which was against someone else, and there is forbidden rebellion, that which tackles the unfairness and injustice happening today which the council is at least partly responsible for. This is the kind of thinking that requires us to celebrate burning down castles yet condemn chalking slogans on the Council House.<br />
<br />
Fun fact; this celebrating the reform act riots was actually my idea, I included it in an <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2010/04/im-going-to-stand-for-election.html" target="_blank">April Fool post</a> about 6 years ago. We all know they read the blog (nasty letters threatening me over the state of my garden tend to coincide with my now occasional flurries of blog posts or anti-council Twitter rants) but strangely, I haven't been given any credit yet.<br />
<br />
Wonder if the homeless camp will find it's way into the forthcoming 'Museum of Rebellion'?<br />
<br />
Fun fact 2; more people have been arrested and/or charged over the homelessness camp and associated protests than over the entire<a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/housing%20allocations" target="_blank"> housing allocations scandal</a> which saw hundreds of council houses misallocated and several disappearing off into dodgy right-to-buy deals. It also included a council employee <a href="http://www.leftlion.co.uk/articles.cfm/title/councillor-jon-collins/id/6994" target="_blank">attacking squatters with a cricket bat</a>...Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-44023501322329848842015-11-24T07:51:00.001+00:002015-11-24T07:51:23.063+00:00Beckhampton Mother and Baby UnitNottingham City Council is proposing to close the Beckhampton Mother and Baby unit, a specialist centre providing education and support to school age pregnant young women. It is proposed that students should remain in mainstream schools instead, with extra support provided 'when required', presumably by a peripatetic support system rather than one on site.<br />
<br />
The Post has an <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Council-plans-close-life-changing-school-teenage/story-28228864-detail/story.html" target="_blank">article</a> today including interviews from pupils and you get a strong impression that such an approach will be inadequate. I have also heard from someone connected to the school that referrals to the unit are being blocked to give the impression that demand is falling.<br />
<br />
Graham Allen, MP for Nottingham North, has publicly criticised the move which is almost unheard of when it is the City Council responsible for a proposal. Normally Labour Party solidarity prevents him from sticking his head above the parapet.<br />
<br />
There is a <a href="https://www.change.org/p/nottingham-city-council-are-trying-to-shut-this-school-save-beckhampton-centre?recruiter=45275735&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=share_email_responsive&utm_content=pm_checklist_email:checklist" target="_blank">petition</a> against the proposals and you might also wish to respond to the <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/article/30496/Pregnant-Teenagers-and-Teenage-Parents-Consultation" target="_blank">public consultation</a> being run by the Council. We are told that no decisions have been made (yeah right) so if enough people respond maybe they'll change their minds. We can live in hope.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-20792979252788502702015-11-17T00:31:00.000+00:002015-11-17T00:31:20.390+00:00More Human Rights HypocrisyThe City Council jumped on the bandwagon today and <a href="http://www.mynottinghamnews.com/minutes-silence-for-paris-victims/" target="_blank">organised a vigil</a> for the victims of the Paris attacks, complete with local bigwigs.<br />
<br />
I feel obliged to point out that the City Council took absolutely no notice of the massacre of over 2000 people in Gaza by the Israelis.<br />
<br />
Furthermore, the number of people killed in Paris is approximately the same as the number of people executed by the Chinese regime in three weeks, something that Nottingham City Council <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/who-cares-about-human-rights-not.html" target="_blank">is falling over itself</a> to invest in.<br />
<br />
Fucking hypocrites.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-32912001313471552712015-11-06T02:44:00.001+00:002015-11-06T02:44:52.548+00:00Who Cares About Human Rights? Not Nottingham...Not a huge amount to say about this that I haven't <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=china" target="_blank">said already</a> in similar circumstances but Nottingham City Council is proudly (or should that be Proud-ly?) <a href="http://www.mynottinghamnews.com/nottingham-embarks-on-uks-first-china-trade-mission-since-chinese-presidents-uk-visit/" target="_blank">announcing</a> that it is joining a delegation to China to scrounge for some cash.<br />
<br />
Once again, no regard for China's appalling human rights record and the international community is left with the impression that Nottingham is a city that doesn't care about such things, as long as we get some Yuan.<br />
<br />
Way to go guys, I don't think.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com9tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-889569192781345522015-10-30T19:00:00.001+00:002015-10-30T19:00:36.316+00:00Abuse Victim 'Silenced' By Nottingham City CouncilTwo posts in one day? Blimey, go me...<br />
<br />
Unfortunately it means that bad things are happening. I've just seen a <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-34670355?SThisFB" target="_blank">news report</a> that Nottingham City Council has taken legal action against Mickey Summers, a lead campaigner and complainant in the <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Beechwood%20Children's%20Home" target="_blank">Beechwood Children's Home</a> scandal to shut him up.<br />
<br />
The Council has taken out an interim anti-social behaviour injunction against Mr Summers with a somewhat wide-ranging scope -<br />
<br />
<i>"The injunction bans him from visiting all "non-residential" council
premises or approaching staff and from posting "any material involving
anyone from Nottingham City Council, its staff, councillors, employees
or agents" on the internet."</i><br />
<br />
Considering that this concerns Mr Summers' experiences of being abused as a child at the hands of NCC (and the County as predecessors) this seems an excessively draconian attempt to silence the victim. NCC is never very keen for people to go around spreading information that undermines its reputation. It often uses the bullshit excuse that staff are affected. You know what I say to those staff? Get over yourself.<br />
<br />
I hope Mr Summers is able to challenge the injunction at the full hearing.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-62656516972846031472015-10-30T17:40:00.001+00:002015-10-30T17:40:36.862+00:00Latest Council Tax Blackmail Wheeze*awakes from slumber, yawns*<br />
<br />
Sorry about the lack of postings, this is due to my ongoing mental decrepitude. I had thought of retiring the blog permanently as I don't really have the energy to keep it going on a regular basis but, well, let's see...<br />
<br />
For now, I want to alert you to NCC's latest wheeze to heap pressure onto people who can't pay their Council Tax. NCC is <a href="http://www.mynottinghamnews.com/council-consults-on-move-to-reduce-council-tax-non-payment/" target="_blank">proposing</a> to report non-payers to Credit Reference Agencies (CRA), something which they accept that no other council does nor is thinking of doing. Part of their justification is a suspicion that people pay other debts before their Council Tax in order to not end up with a CRA entry.<br />
<br />
Ok, well assuming people are that daft, won't that actually make things worse? Dodgy loan companies will be able to see than applicants have been prepared to miss CT payments to pay off low priority debts and will see them as a safer bet. Remember, many lenders do not use CRAs to tell if a person is 'financially responsible' they use them to risk assess whether the applicant is likely to repay that particular debt and whether they are a person they can make a profit from. Hence the fact that you can always get credit, just that the worse your credit file, the less likely your kneecaps are to survive the experience.<br />
<br />
Perhaps more importantly, if you sign up for a loan or credit card you sign up to T&Cs that allow the lender to pass your details to CRAs, otherwise they would be in breach of data protection rules. No such agreement is entered into with Council Tax as payment is a statutory requirement i.e. you are forced, rather than agree, to pay. Therefore it is my belief that NCC would be in breach of the Data Protection Act if it were to pass details of non-payers to CRAs.<br />
<br />
We should also remember that a big part of the reason for high numbers of non-payers is NCC's decision to widen the paynet to include a minimum 20% charge even to those of us who are on Income Support levels of income. Much bleating about cuts to central funding and how they 'cannot afford' to provide services, while at the same time refusing to accept that we cannot afford to pay despite real terms cuts to our benefits. Hypocrisy to the max and demonstrative of Nottingham Labour's fetish for threatening and punishing the poor.<br />
<br />
I strongly recommend that you respond to the '<a href="https://www.snapsurveys.com/wh/s.asp?k=144491981437" target="_blank">consultation</a>' on this proposal and tell them what an illegal unjustifiable measure it is.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-73201701814096570722015-02-06T01:47:00.002+00:002015-02-06T01:49:27.019+00:00Contempt For Democracy Part 2 (Subtitle; What's That Burning Smell)As well as the important stuff as detailed in the last post, we also have the <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/think-tories-are-reading-blog.html" target="_blank">questions</a> the Tory councillors asked which seemed to mirror my own doomed attempts at playing democracy and holding the Dear Leader to account.<br />
<br />
Now, I'm the first to admit that you could quite happily replace the Tory councillors at NCC with garden gnomes and it would be some months before anybody noticed. Frankly you could say the same with 75% of the Labour councillors too. I can say stuff like that out loud, I'm just a blogger. If you're the leader of the councillor I think it's traditionally expected that you respect the fact that people did actually vote for them and that you at least pretend to give a shit what they say.<br />
<br />
Not JoCo.<br />
<br />
Again, straight from the <a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/mgAi.aspx?ID=4761" target="_blank">minutes</a> -<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>"Councillor Georgina Culley
asked the following question of the Leader:</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>Would the Leader of the Council
inform the council how many questions for City Council meetings
addressed to him by the public have been refused and deemed
unworthy of submission and response?</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>Councillor Jon Collins replied
as follows:</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>Thank you Lord Mayor. I'm happy
to say I've answered all the questions from the public I've been
asked in this chamber."</i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I bet JoCo thought he'd been REALLY CLEVER with that. You can see what he did there, he said he'd answered every question he'd been asked 'in this chamber'. So presumably, he meant not including the ones he'd been <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/is-jon-collins-shameless-liar-part-2.html" target="_blank">shielded from</a> by ever obliging and sycophantic Lords Mayor. I bet he got many congratulatory pats on the back for that piece of low cunning.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
But, whatever you think of the Tories, it's clear that he didn't answer the question that he was actually asked so JoCo* is clearly guilty of LYING by omission. So, as I said before he is a LIAR and the burning smell is his PANTS ON FIRE, the lying liar.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
*If I get sued I will just state that when referring to 'JoCo' I was simpply referring to an obscure clown without a moral compass.</div>
Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-16514291644267345652015-02-06T01:19:00.000+00:002015-02-06T01:20:27.248+00:00Contempt For Democracy Part 1So, the Palestine Solidarity Campaign got to <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/palestine-solidarity-campaign-petition.html" target="_blank">present their petition</a>, with over 5000 signatures, to full Council. Sadly it's almost as if they needn't have bothered.<br />
<br />
Because the petition reached the magic 5k the council was required to actually debate the petition motion. I'm not sure that this has ever happened before (I'm prepared to be corrected so do write in) so it's a significant matter to be considered.<br />
<br />
Anyway, here's what Nottingham City Council considers to be a debate.<br />
<br />
Firstly, an extract from the <a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/documents/s19160/Extract%20from%20Standing%20Orders.pdf" target="_blank">standing orders</a> concerning petitions that require a debate due to having received the required number of signatures -<br />
<br />
<i>"The relevant Portfolio Holder(s) will present a provisional written response to the petition to inform discussion and to help full Council agree a response."</i><br />
<br />
In this case it was the beloved Leader, so 'inform the discussion' and 'help...agree a response' is pretty much a direct instruction. An d here's the 'provisional written response' he provided -<br />
<br />
<i>“Nottingham City Council acknowledges
receipt of the petition collated by Nottingham Palestine Solidarity
Campaign, which accumulated over 5000 signatures from Nottingham
residents.</i><br />
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>Nottingham City Council’s petitions
scheme requires that a petition will be debated at a meeting of the
City Council if it receives 5000 or more signatures from Nottingham
residents and is presented to the Head of Constitutional Services
at least 12 working days prior to the next Council meeting. This
scheme was introduced by the City Council in June 2010 following
national legislation which, at that time, required Councils to have
a petitions scheme.</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>The City Council recognises the hard work of
the Nottingham Palestine Solidarity Campaign in gathering over 5000
signatures, which were counted and verified as representing
Nottingham people.</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>As a local authority, Nottingham City Council
has responsibility for local services and influence over many
issues of local concern. From cleaning streets and caring for the
vulnerable, to job creation and encouraging investment, the remit
of the City Council is wide and varied. As a City Council these are
our primary concerns and we should focus most of our time on these
issues where we can have direct control or influence. Nonetheless,
we also recognise that international issues such as this are of
great concern to many local people, and it is therefore important
that they receive due consideration when representations such as
these are made locally.</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>Nottingham City Council takes seriously its
responsibility to promote community cohesion. Our recent
‘Citizen Survey’ shows that 90% of those asked feel
that Nottingham is a place where people of different backgrounds
and opinions get on well together. The Council will continue to do
all we can to maintain and improve this and are therefore happy to
transparently work with the Nottingham Palestine Solidarity
Campaign to address the concerns raised
in the petition for further consideration within our local
context.”</i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Note the complete lack of any concrete commitments there.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Oh and the debate? From the minutes -</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>"The petition and the written response were
debated by Councillors, and the response was supported."</i></div>
<br />
Words fail etc. And so does democracy.<br />
<span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;"><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal;"><br class="Apple-interchange-newline" /></span></span></span>Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-22717644347303613272015-01-26T13:47:00.001+00:002015-01-26T13:47:12.263+00:00Think the Tories Are Reading the BlogToday is the full council meeting which pals from the Palestine Solidarity Campaign <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/palestine-solidarity-campaign-petition.html" target="_blank">will be attending</a>. Good luck to them with that.<br />
<br />
On looking at the agenda, and in particular the questions to be asked by councillors, I came across this -<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h_tjWRB1hdk/VMZCwp_EJgI/AAAAAAAABGo/MGWHN89kc8o/s1600/Toryqs.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-h_tjWRB1hdk/VMZCwp_EJgI/AAAAAAAABGo/MGWHN89kc8o/s1600/Toryqs.jpg" height="409" width="640" /></a></div>
<br />Think they might have been reading the <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/is-jon-collins-shameless-liar-part-2.html" target="_blank">blog</a>...<br />
<br />
Just for the record, it did cross my mind contacting one of the opposition councillors to see if they'd be interested in asking questions about the issue but I kind of draw the line at working with Tories. I also briefly considered contacting one of my local (Labour) councillors but ... yeah right.<br />
<br />
My guess is that JoCo will answer this by throwing a few insults, claims of 'needlessly' re-openiing 'closed' issues and not actually answering the question at all. Bonus points if I get a mention by JoCo as the inspiration, probably as a 'sad blogger'. Be interesting to see what happens.<br />
<br />Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-29155332147325095602015-01-20T09:20:00.000+00:002015-01-20T11:18:17.274+00:00Palestine Solidarity Campaign Petition Goes Before Full CouncilThe local branch of the <a href="http://www.palestinecampaign.org/" target="_blank">Palestine Solidarity Campaign</a> has submitted its petition asking NCC to support the <a href="http://www.bdsmovement.net/bdsintro" target="_blank">Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions</a> Campaign against Israel and to call upon the government to generally pressure Israel into obeying UN Resolutions and the Geneva Convention. The full text of the motion before the Council is as follows;<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>“We the undersigned
request the City Council to undertake the following
action:</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>To transparently work with
Nottingham Palestine Solidarity Campaign to draw and pass a motion
affirming its official support and calling upon the UK government
to support the following against Israel until it complies with
international laws:</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>1. The “Boycott, Divestment and
Sanctions” (BDS) campaign;</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>2. An end to attacks against
Palestine</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>3. An end to Administrative
Detention;</i></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<i>
</i>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<i>4. An arms embargo.”</i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
As with any petition/motion on an essentially national issue some will wonder why the council should bother; in fact expect Zionists to campaign against the motion on that very point, along with the usual empty accusations of anti-semitism. However, the agreement of the motion will send a strong message of support to the Palestinians and a further message to central government that the fate of Palestinians matters to people in Nottingham and that we can no longer sit on the sidelines as we have done up to now.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
At the end of last year Leicester City Council agreed a motion condemning Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian lands and resolving to boycott products from illegal Israeli settlements in the West Bank, to <a href="http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Anti-Jewish-concerns-Labour-Leicester-City/story-24964167-detail/story.html" target="_blank">traditional furore</a>. Nottingham's petition goes considerably further, asking for full adoption of the BDS campaign. This includes removal of any investments in Israel and a boycott of ALL Israeli goods, not just those from illegal West Bank settlements. In truth, this probably means the council is even less likely to agree to it.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
NCC doesn't have a particularly good [recent*] record on condemning oppression abroad, <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/were-on-slow-boat.html" target="_blank">enthusiastically lapping up Chinese investmen</a>t despite the illegal occupation of Tibet. This past record would open the council up to charges of hypocrisy, with more justification than those faced by Leicester. </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
I strongly recommend that you contact your local councillors and urge them to vote in favour of the motion.<br />
<br />
*Addendum; back in 1984 Nottingham City Council DID have the political courage to agree a comprehensive policy to boycott and divest from South Africa, see p20 of <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CC8QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Faamarchives.org%2Ffile-view%2Fcategory%2F30-local-authorities.html%3Fdownload%3D4395%3Alas11-local-authority-action-against-apartheid%26start%3D20&ei=6De-VPcewZXsBo7zgNgO&usg=AFQjCNEwm0xAomyMxTkuoZUCN5nNLVumXg&sig2=xnUs-HmEkfMcQW15gWIscg&bvm=bv.83829542,d.ZGU&cad=rja" target="_blank">this report</a>. </div>
Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-40230773763193701622015-01-09T00:52:00.000+00:002015-01-10T03:16:09.339+00:00Free Speech Depends on Where You AreI would normally just be having a quiet little chuckle over the <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Nottingham-councillor-Rosemary-Healy-apologies/story-25813157-detail/story.html" target="_blank">news</a> that Nottingham Labour has suspended Cllr Rosemary Healy for retweeting a satire of the Tories latest election poster, along with her ludicrous defence that she had no idea what the picture was.<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://twitter.com/ThomasPride/status/551879081852416002" target="_blank"><img alt="https://twitter.com/ThomasPride/status/551879081852416002" border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-uu05PoHxSc4/VK8coGZLB0I/AAAAAAAABGY/QUMpWHlIWhk/s1600/Tory%2BPisstake%2Btweet.jpg" height="400" width="390" /></a></div>
<br />
<br />
I mean, it's not Skegness beach is it?<br />
<br />
Even Ed Milliband, on a day trip to Hucknall, <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jan/08/miliband-labour-councillor-retweet-auschwitz-tory-poster" target="_blank">waded in</a> saying the tweet was “objectionable and totally wrong”. Blimey.<br />
<br />
But then of course the Charlie Hebdo killings happened in Paris and suddenly publishing extremely offensive satirical cartoons is a cornerstone of free speech. Frankly, if you haven't yet published a cartoon of the prophet Mohammed in a compromising position by now you are an enemy of freedom, truth and light. Well, that's if all the media organisations pledging to keep the magazine going and reprinting their cartoons in 'solidarity' are anything to go by. Leftlion <a href="http://www.leftlion.co.uk/articles.cfm/title/leftlion-illustrators-in-support-of-charlie-hebdo/id/7186" target="_blank">had a go</a> at doing some of their own, see if you can guess which one they later <a href="https://www.facebook.com/leftlion?fref=ts" target="_blank">described on Facebook</a> as a picture of a 'typical terrorist'.<br />
<br />
Let me pause briefly to say that I'm not arguing equivalence here. On the one hand, 12 people were shot dead in cold blood, on the other, a minor local politician has had the whip suspended but is otherwise unhurt, not even financially. I am about to criticise some of the Charlie Hebdo output but let's make no mistake; no matter how offensive you are a death sentence, especially an extra-judicial one, can never be justified.<br />
<br />
But the consequences of your actions in themselves don't make any difference as to whether you were expressing free speech or not. To my mind, many of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons are way more offensive than the Thomas pride mock-up, yet the former is 'free speech' now and the latter 'objectionable and totally wrong' apparently. I can't quite square that myself.<br />
<br />
The fact is that we don't have absolute free speech and neither should we. We have legal limits to what we can print or say in order to prevent defamation, harassment and hatred/incitement etc, as do most countries. Those laws probably aren't perfect but the key point is that free speech has limits. My own view is that a few of the Charlie Hebdo cartoons I've seen cross those limits (I understand they have indeed been prosocuted under French hate-crime laws on occasion), the Thomas Pride mock-up really doesn't.<br />
<br />
The killings of the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists are not a free speech issue, they are a 'turning up at someone's workplace and murdering them is never justified, even if they have been dicks' issue. Healy's suspension is merely the local Labour Party disappearing up itself. Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-18052684526670916092015-01-05T19:03:00.000+00:002015-01-05T19:05:49.864+00:00Is Jon Collins a Shameless Liar Part 2So, following on from <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/is-jon-collins-shameless-liar.html" target="_blank">yesterday's piece</a> about JoCo's fibbing to Leftlion, here's what happened next.<br />
<br />
Rather than barge in accusing JoCo of untruths I thought it would be an idea to give him the opportunity to publicly explain himself. After all, there could have been further developments since that report four years ago. So I s<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/article/24428/Submit-a-Question-to-be-Answered-at-A-Meeting-of-Full-Council" target="_blank">ubmitted a question to be answered at full council</a> in the following terms -<br />
<br />
<i>"In a recent interview with local magazine Leftlion, Cllr Jon Collins was asked about the mis-allocation of council houses and the perceived lack of action taken.</i><br />
<i><br /> In reply Cllr Collins stated -</i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /> "A number of people were prosecuted and lost their jobs, others had formal warnings and several of the houses in question were re-allocated."</i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /></i> <i><a href="http://www.leftlion.co.uk/articles.cfm/title/councillor-jon-collins/id/6994">http://www.leftlion.co.uk/articles.cfm/title/councillor-jon-collins/id/6994</a></i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /> The report to the Council's Executive Board in December 2010 said that no houses had been re-possessed due to legal arguments being weak, one right-to-buy application was being contested and one overpaid right to buy discount had been recovered and that was it.</i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /> As far as disciplinary action was concerned, one agency worker was let go, three permanent staff were investigated, in only one case was disciplinary action pursued and a final warning was issued.</i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /></i> <i><a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/Data/Executive%20Board/20101221/Agenda/$PIRreport%20-%2046138.doc.pdf">http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/Data/Executive%20Board/20101221/Agenda/$PIRreport%20-%2046138.doc.pdf</a></i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /> Of course, it may be that more things had happened since that report, despite it being presented as a final summary. Perhaps the leader could update citizens with the full picture of action taken and thus explain the apparent inconsistency.</i> <i></i><br />
<i><br /> Lastly, did the City Council explore the possibility of individuals being charged with misconduct in public office? Was any advice sought on this possibility? If so, what was this advice?"</i><br />
<br />
Want to know what happened? They refused to let the question be asked. The reply I received on 4 December 2014 was as follows -<br />
<br />
<i>"The Lord Mayor has considered your question and decided that it should receive a departmental written response. This is because it relates to a historical issue that has been addressed in Council questions and other public forums already."</i><br />
<br />
I wrote back to challenge this and received the following the next day -<br />
<br />
<i>"The Lord Mayor decides which questions are asked at the Full Council meeting and has made the decision that this question should receive a written response. <br /><br /> I have spoken with the department and they have confirmed that the position given in the Executive Board report you have referred to is still the position so I’m sorry but there is no further information that can be provided."</i><br />
<br />
I should first of all say that I've received no departmental written response so far and I don't expect to get one. The <a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=155&MId=3569&Ver=4" target="_blank">minutes</a> of the full council meeting on 8 December 2014 falsely state the following -<br />
<br />
<i>"No questions from citizens were
received."</i><br />
<br />
The upshot of this is that JoCo can hardly claim that he wasn't given an opportunity to explain himself in a high profile public forum. After all, he was the one moaning that nobody wanted to report the end findings of the enquiry and said that things should be done 'as transparently as possible'.<br />
<br />
It also means that the Lord Mayor, <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/article/23792/Councillor-Ian-Malcolm" target="_blank">Cllr Ian Malcolm</a>, is prepared to spike citizens' questions to council if they might be embarrassing to the Politburo which essentially makes the whole thing meaningless. According the the Lord Mayor's <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/article/23941/The-Lord-Mayor-of-Nottingham" target="_blank">webpage</a> his key task is -<br />
<br />
<i>"To act as the a-political figurehead of the City Council; champion of
the city of Nottingham and its people and symbolise the social cohesion
of the city and its many cultures and faith"</i><br />
<br />
Note the 'a-political' (sic) bit. He should be ashamed of himself.<br />
<br />
The one thing the replies do confirm is that no further progress has been made since the Executive Board report, in turn confirming that JoCo's Leftlion comments were indeed a flight of fancy.<br />
<br />
Cllr Jon Collins, your pants are on fire.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-15324442700620318882015-01-04T19:28:00.000+00:002015-01-05T15:37:47.349+00:00Is Jon Collins a Shameless Liar?So the blog awakes from its slumber for 2015. Will it last? Who knows...<br />
<br />
But back to the matter in hand. JoCo appeared in local music mag 'Leftlion' for an <a href="http://www.leftlion.co.uk/articles.cfm/title/councillor-jon-collins/id/6994" target="_blank">interview</a> back in October. It wasn't exactly challenging, more 'Left Love-In' than Leftlion if you ask me but he was asked about why 'no action' was taken over the <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/housing%20allocations" target="_blank">Housing Allocations</a> scandal. I will quote his answer in full -<br />
<br />
<i>"We did take action, it was just largely unreported by local media who
were very quick to report the early facts, but less interested in
covering the action points after that. A number of people were
prosecuted and lost their jobs, others had formal warnings and several
of the houses in question were re-allocated. The issue illustrates why
we don’t want to work on projects like reconfiguring city boundaries and
why it’s better to do our core jobs to the best of our ability, as
transparently as possible."</i><br />
<br />
The first thing you'll notice is that the last sentence is just gobbledegook, it makes no sense whatsoever. But in addition he states as fact the following -<br />
<br />
- 'a number' of people were prosecuted and lost their jobs<br />
- 'others' (note the plural) had formal warnings<br />
- 'several' houses were re-allocated.<br />
<br />
Compare this to the only <a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/Data/Executive%20Board/20101221/Agenda/$PIRreport%20-%2046138.doc.pdf" target="_blank">public statement</a> ever made by NCC at the Executive Board meeting in December 2010. You can read it for yourself to check but as far as I can tell the sum total of action taken is as follows -<br />
<br />
- NO tenancies repossessed, although one case is said to be 'under review' (paras 1.3-1.5).<br />
- One 'right to buy' application being 'contested' and another right to buy discount being recovered via the courts (para 1.6)<br />
- NO fraud cases brought (para 1.7) <br />
<br />
None of this could really be said to be 'several houses re-allocated' and at best it could only be said that two people were prosecuted, more likely only one. Technically speaking 'two' is of course 'a number' but that's not how most people would interpret it in conversation. So far we have clear falsehood and obfuscation from JoCo there.<br />
<br />
- ONE agency worker had their 'service terminated'. There's no information as to whether this extended as far as being sacked from their agency but we'll count it up as a 'person losing their job'.<br />
- two workers investigated but no disciplinary action pursued<br />
- one worker who received a final written warning<br />
<br />
So one worker lost their job (possibly) and one received a written warning. Not 'a number' or 'others' plural at all. JoCo's account to Leftlion is demonstrably false.<br />
<br />
For completeness I would suggest that there is absolutely no possibility that JoCo would not have been kept fully informed of all action taken, in considerately more detail than that given publicly too. He was at the Executive Board meeting where the report was presented and, even though he left early, he would have received a copy of the report.<br />
<br />
So in conclusion, JoCo expressed false statements, along with some obfuscation, and he must have known them to be false. The word for a person who does that is 'liar'.<br />
<br />
TBC in part 2 Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-5814380761601108222014-09-20T00:12:00.001+01:002014-09-20T00:12:28.503+01:00Let's Get NCC to Boycott IsraelJust a quick one.<br />
<br />
It's the last few days left to sign the <a href="https://www.change.org/p/nottingham-city-council-to-adopt-as-policy-the-boycott-divestment-and-sanctions-campaign-against-israel-in-support-of-an-end-to-attacks-on-gaza-the-end-of-administrative-detention-and-an-arms-embargo" target="_blank">petition</a> asking Nottingham City Council to adopt the <a href="http://www.bdsmovement.net/" target="_blank">Boycott, Divestments and Sanctions Campaign</a> against Israel. The deadline is 24 September.<br />
<br />
BDS is an international campaign which aims to pressure Israel into respecting international law and to end it's effective apartheid state oppressing Palestinians.<br />
<br />
Please do sign up. Over 2000 Palestinians were killed in the recent attack on Gaza. Economic pressure is the only real hope for Palestinians subject to arrest, military checkpoints and military attacks.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-29209735680345782022014-09-18T16:22:00.000+01:002014-09-18T16:27:51.132+01:00JoCo, Get Ready For Your Close-UpNottingham City Council has just agreed a new <a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/documents/s9756/Policy%20on%20recording%20and%20reporting%20on%20public%20meetings.pdf" target="_blank">policy</a> (pdf) allowing 'citizens' to film and/or record public meetings of the council. This is in response to new <a href="http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/2095/contents/made" target="_blank">government regulations</a> saying that they had to.<br />
<br />
Of course, a policy like this would have been much more use years ago when the legal right to film public meetings was unclear but there you go.<br />
<br />
Here's one of the first examples of legal filming I could find, taken at the very same meeting the policy was agreed...<br />
<br />
<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/bK6XS59pEJs" width="560"></iframe>
<br />
PS, not my video, link to original <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK6XS59pEJs" target="_blank">here</a>. Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-18349475909617116122014-08-03T05:03:00.000+01:002014-08-03T05:03:33.661+01:00Beechwood Children's Home Abuse ScandalInstitutional child abuse. How horrible a concept is that eh? You're taken from an abusive situation as a child to a place that is supposed to be safe, a place where people, part of the state machinery, are supposed to look after you. Except they do exactly the opposite...<br />
<br />
The news has been full of stories of such abuse recently, largely because many of the abusers are/were famous and, in some cases dead.<br />
<br />
So it's with some trepidation that I'm now going to look at an emerging story of institutional abuse in our manor. Everything I have got hold of is in the public domain. It's all second hand obviously and finding what you might call 'facts' is a bit like nailing jelly to the wall. But here goes.<br />
<br />
First thing is to set out a basic historical context. Until 1998 children's homes, along with all other children's social services in the city were the responsibility of Nottinghamshire County Council. In 1998, the City Council was given unitary status and took over all services within the city boundaries which had previously been the County's remit. This included all social services, education, trading standards, all sorts. I think it's probably fair to say that, as far as I can tell, the majority of the abuse allegations concerned incidents happening prior to the 1998 handover.<br />
<br />
The first <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Sexual-abuse-claims-kids-home-probed/story-12948682-detail/story.html" target="_blank">allegations</a> appeared in 2011 concerning the former Beechwood Children's Home on Woodborough Road, which closed in 2006. Claims of abuse at other homes locally surfaced in 2013 and hit the <a href="http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/beechwood-childrens-home-abuse-investigation-2054196" target="_blank">nationals</a>. Note the bravery of the individual who gave up his right to anonymity for that story, this led another brave individual to <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Childhoods-stolen-victims-learned-trust/story-19555513-detail/story.html" target="_blank">do the same</a>. The latter individual wrote a much longer personal account which you can read <a href="http://news.truthjuice.co.uk/index.php/2014/05/police-corruption-child-abuse-in-nottingham/" target="_blank">here</a>. I think it's fair to say he has been unimpressed with officialdom's attempts to 'help' him. The police have called their investigation 'Operation Daybreak'.<br />
<br />
Not entirely surprisingly, it appears that some <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Protesters-pressure-lost-information/story-20051848-detail/story.html" target="_blank">records have been 'lost'</a>. Knowing local authorities as I do I should say that may not be entirely due to evil intent (as opposed to some dumbass chucking them in a skip) but it hardly lightens the atmosphere or encourages a feeling of mutual trust.<br />
<br />
More recently it has emerged that a total of <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-27266738" target="_blank">£250k compensation has been paid</a> to some of those alleging abuse. Again, most cases were from the time of the County's administration but there are more to be considered. The information apparently originated from a journo's FoI request but unfortunately, the City's Freedom of Information 'Disclosure Log' <a href="http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/InformationGovernance/DisclosureLog.aspx" target="_blank">gives us the question</a> asked but is one of the many entries that neglects to include the response files (general point NCC, please sort this issue out, it happens a lot).<br />
<br />
Anyway, that's the mainstream stuff. This blog doesn't deal with County Council issues, that's for others to worry about with my limited mental energy. According to the media links above, it seems that the City is leading on all legal claims against both councils so that keeps that aspect within our remit. The police? Fuck knows who really makes the decisions there.<br />
<br />
Anyway, a bit of simple Google search has thrown up huge amounts of stuff, only a tiny proportion of which I can link to here. But here's one thing that seriously caught my eye, I think it's a bit sinister.<br />
<br />
Back in 2003, Community Care magazine ran an <a href="http://www.communitycare.co.uk/2003/05/01/nottingham-home-should-have-shut/" target="_blank">article</a> about the death of a resident at, you've guessed it, Beechwood Children's Home. It concerns a 15 year old girl who was found hanged. The article states as fact that she was a victim of bullying at the home. That's a grim story in anybody's language but, sadly, not completely unheard of in the looked-after children sphere. Was it 'just' bullying?<br />
<br />
It gets significantly dodgier looking when you read the allegation that the National Care
Standards Commission (now defunct/replaced) had previously advised the City Council to close the home on the basis that the home had become “steadily more unstable and difficult to manage”. The Social Services Director at the time said “I don’t recall this
recommendation ever being made.”<br />
<br />
Hmm. "I don't recall..." There are lots of things I don't 'recall' but that doesn't mean they didn't happen.<br />
<br />
I'm presuming that the lawyers representing the survivors have all this because I would've thought it would significantly undermine any claim by the City that they had no idea there were any problems at the home. That's not the same as saying they knew about all the abuse but you know, a kid hanged herself, you'd hope they'd have looked into it.<br />
<br />
The final bit for now is the rather disturbing claims concerning a woman called Melanie Shaw.<br />
<br />
Most of the allegations appear to come from the blog UKColumn. There are countless other entries on the web but most seem to be a copy and paste from the original.<br />
<br />
What is claimed is that Ms Shaw is a witness and a victim of abuse at Beechwood. However UKColumn <a href="http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/melanie-shaw-beechwood-child-abuse-witness-held-peterborough-prison" target="_blank">reported</a> that Ms Shaw has recently been arrested and was being held on remand in Peterborough Prison. This is backed up by a <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Woman-appear-court-life-endangering-arson-charges/story-21645582-detail/story.html" target="_blank">Nottm Post court report</a>. I'm not sure of the political stance of UKColumn but the detail demands that we take the reports seriously, at least until they are credibly disproved. There is talk about a 'secret hearing' at the Crown Court and that Ms Shaw is accused of arson. There is a later <a href="http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/abuse-witness-melanie-shaw-remanded-no-evidence-presented" target="_blank">report</a> of a further hearing where her remand at Peterborough was extended. I can't verify anything in it but it doesn't make pretty reading, especially about her treatment in prison. What also seems a bit odd is that local media don't seem to be willing to touch Ms Shaw's story with a bargepole.<br />
<br />
Whatever the actual detail of the allegations that got Ms Shaw in front of the Crown Court, you have to wonder why an abuse survivor is on remand in a Cat B prison when she just happens to be making allegations against the people who used to look after her. Longtime readers of this blog would not be surprised at a suggestion that Notts Police might be willing to help the City Council out in a time of need. Frankly, I doubt that anybody sensible in the UK would be surprised at the suggestion that the police would be there for the establishment if the shit hit the fan.<br />
<br />
Hopefully much more of this will come out. Hopefully, at least some of the police are actually doing their job. We'll see.<br />
<br />
Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-49601073359928026052014-07-10T15:49:00.000+01:002014-07-10T15:49:09.809+01:00Nottingham Labour - Tories in DisguiseAs many of you will know the three main public sector unions, along with the NUT, have called a 24 hour strike today.<br />
<br />
Here's what council leader Jon Collins of the 'People's Party' <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/strike" target="_blank">had to say</a> about that -<br />
<br />
<i>"We understand that people are upset about the reduction in living standards as pensions are eroded and pay hasn't kept up with inflation. However, workers across the private and public sector are in the same position and we don't believe that strike action that closes schools, inconveniences parents and loses pupils a day's education is the best way forward."</i><br />
<br />
Who needs Tories eh?<i> </i>Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-57139766826433604152014-07-08T13:47:00.000+01:002014-07-08T13:47:43.103+01:00Councillor Resigns Labour WhipBig news!<br />
<br />
Strange that there's been nothing in the Post about this but it seems that <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/Cllr%20Dewinton" target="_blank">Cllr Emma Dewinton</a> has resigned the Labour whip and now <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/article/23775/Councillor-Emma-Dewinton" target="_blank">sits as an independent</a>.<br />
<br />
I just noticed this now in a <a href="http://committee.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/documents/s8560/Report.pdf" target="_blank">report to full council</a> about the resultant rejigs to committee membership. Cllr Michael Edwards made a <a href="https://michaelmedwards.wordpress.com/2014/06/16/could-it-be-we-were-all-so-happy-then/" target="_blank">mention</a> of it on his own blog about 3 weeks ago but I'm not a regular reader so I missed it. Here's his version of her reasons for resigning -<br />
<br />
"The gist being the Labour party nationally had not got enough detailed
policy and we needed to go into more detail at the council.<br />
<br />
And that the scrutiny of detail is being undermined by Labour having too large a majority on the council."<br />
<br />
Re that last bit; it's not the large majority in itself that undermines scrutiny, it's the willingness of certain high-ups to exploit that majority to cover things up. Like dodgy council house deals...<br />
<br />
Wonder if she'll be joining the <a href="http://www.nottinghampost.com/Lord-Mayor-new-political-party-city/story-17025944-detail/story.html" target="_blank">Nottingham Independence Party</a>?Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-91527065226236001762014-06-27T03:23:00.000+01:002014-06-27T03:23:03.171+01:00What Disjointed Policy Looks Like Pt 94Buskers. Mixed bag aren't they? For every <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SztCNEHzXro" target="_blank">Sam Lindo</a> there's some idiot bellowing about a BRII-IIIDGE OVERRR TERRUBBLED WORT-ARRRR or blasting away on an annoying tin whistle (tautology alert).<br />
<br />
But you know, some people like that sort of thing. A range of abilities is an essential part of busking, all part of the variety and spontaneity and all that.<br />
<br />
Nottingham City Council seems a bit confused about what ti thinks about busking, as evidenced by these two tweets -<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f8YwgtnmB0U/U6zIJvJGpPI/AAAAAAAAApg/EmM0EkEtWbw/s1600/Busking+1.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-f8YwgtnmB0U/U6zIJvJGpPI/AAAAAAAAApg/EmM0EkEtWbw/s1600/Busking+1.jpg" height="258" width="400" /></a></div>
<br />
So only 'authorised' buskers allowed. Have you got a license for that ukelele young man? THE MAN has declared war on street entertainment. Certainly, if I wanted to help kill off a local street entertainment scene, a load of clumsy regulation is probably the means I'd use.<br />
<br />
But hang on, what's this?<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
</div>
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-C8JrlazBcX0/U6zJCgkLJRI/AAAAAAAAAps/5Ld904l2bU4/s1600/Busking+2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-C8JrlazBcX0/U6zJCgkLJRI/AAAAAAAAAps/5Ld904l2bU4/s1600/Busking+2.jpg" height="230" width="400" /></a> </div>
<br />
It seems that THE MAN loves buskers now, we've got the '<a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/bigbusk" target="_blank">Big Busk</a>', all part of the vibrant city and all that. Note that they include a 'code of conduct' as long as your arm although much of it is probably unenforceable.<br />
<br />
You also have to apply for a permit, although the legal basis for such a requirement isn't made clear. They've probably simply made one up. Perhaps it's all about getting people used to the idea of being subject to regulation...<br />
<br />
So it looks like NCC loves the 'vibrant city' aspect of busking, as long as it's only the right sort of authorised vibrance and that there isn't too much of it in one go. I wonder which committee will get the job of holding auditions.<br />
<br />
Personally, just like the <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/search/label/street%20drinking" target="_blank">public space drinking issue</a>, it's another case of the regulation/ASB fetishists wanking themselves into a frenzy at another opportunity to stamp their authority on the public space.Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5279091405234136771.post-54557070100162781312014-06-09T16:28:00.001+01:002014-06-10T18:16:06.862+01:00Bridge LOLsHuman rights organisations across the world have praised Nottingham City Council and tram operator NET for their sensitivity in leaving it for a whole week after the 25th anniversary of the Tiannamen Square massacre before <a href="http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/pressarchive/index.aspx?articleid=27771" target="_blank">naming a tram bridge</a> in honour of the 'special relationship' shared between Nottingham and Ningbo in China.<br />
<br />
Speaking on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals such as his Housing Benefit being cut etc, one human rights advocate said -<br />
<br />
"Bearing in mind China's appalling human rights record which includes, among other things, more people subjected to the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China" target="_blank">death penalty</a> than the rest of the world put together, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China" target="_blank">religious persecution</a> and continued <a href="http://www.unitednations4freetibet.com/" target="_blank">occupation and repression in Tibet</a>, holding the bridge naming on 4th June 2014, the 25th anniversary of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiananmen_Square_protests_of_1989" target="_blank">Tiannamen Square Massacre</a> may have been seen as grossly insensitive. So it is gratifying that they left it for a week and I am happy to accept that this makes it alright."<br />
<br />
The ceremony will commence with a line of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_59" target="_blank">Type 59</a> battle tanks rumbling over the bridge before being met by a lone male holding a couple of shopping bags. Celebrations will end with order being resumed and dissent being crushed.<br />
<br />
Addendum; this isn't the first time the City Council has engaged in a <a href="http://ncclols.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/were-on-slow-boat.html" target="_blank">China lovefest</a> in apparent ignorance of human rights issues. Andyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03710776765139258627noreply@blogger.com0